$I Billion for Injured New Yorkers
Our Results
  • $30.1 Million NYC - Medical Malpractice Case
  • $15 Million Manhattan - Medical Malpractice Case
  • $3 Million Queens - Wrongful Death Case
  • $5.5 Million Bronx - Birth Injury Accident
  • $30.1 Million NYC - Medical Malpractice Case
  • $15 Million Manhattan - Medical Malpractice Case
  • $3 Million Queens - Wrongful Death Case
  • $5.5 Million Bronx - Birth Injury Accident
  • $7.75 Million NYC - Medical Malpractice Case
Rosenberg, Minc, Falkoff & Wolff, LLP
Experienced & Trusted Medical Malpractice Lawyers
Call today for a Free Consultation
1-866-516-5887
Serving the greater NYC Area: Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, Bronx & Staten Island
Attorneys

What is a Motion to Reargue in a Medical Malpractice Case

What is a Motion to Reargue

In motion to reargue, the attorney will be requesting the court to reconsider a decision that the court has already made on a request. Here is an example when this could occur. During the course of a medical malpractice lawsuit, the plaintiff's lawyer might ask the defense for a particular document that the lawyer thinks is paramount. For instance, the document could be a record of the hospital where the patient was treated, and the defense simply refuses to provide it.

Now, the plaintiff's lawyer will have the option of going to court and making a motion or formal request, explaining the fact that defense does not want to turn over this record. The lawyer must provide to the court, legal support for his request or legal reasoning why the defense should turn over this record. The defense will also have the opportunity to explain to the court why they are not providing the hospital record. The judge will then make a ruling or take a decision on the matter.

When can an Attorney make a Motion to Reargue

If for some reason the lawyer does not like the court's decision, the lawyer can come back and request on paper that the judge reconsider his decision. The lawyer may do this because he feels it is extremely important for his case to get the record from the hospital. When the lawyer makes the request to the judge to reconsider his decision, and it is again denied by the judge, the lawyer still has the ability to try to appeal to that decision.

The lawyer can take that decision and approach the appellate court. Here the lawyer will ask the appellate court to reconsider or ask for an evaluation of the judge's decision, whether the decision taken by the judge was correct or not.

Simple Logic

Therefore, motion to reargue simply implies a request asking the judge to reconsider his former decision. Suppose, the lawyer does not have any new arguments to make and does not have any new evidence to present, the chances the judge will change his mind are quite slim.

Actually, unless the lawyer has something new to show to the judge, or make a new argument, or a new legal case, it is highly unlikely for the judge to change his mind. This is crucial to understand, since the judge is not going to change his decision unless the lawyer has something new to offer that has a bearing on the matter.

Possibly a Backfire

Motion to reargue could be crucial for a medical malpractice case, especially when there are some medical records or information to be acquired that the defense is unwilling to share. Since the judge has already established a decision on the matter, the lawyer has to consider carefully what legal points would make him change his earlier decision. Simply making the motion to argue without having strong points or arguments would be a waste of time, and it might only make the judge more adamant about the decision he has already made and conveyed.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Learn About Medical Malpractice Cases in NYC

Watch all videos »

Listen to our clients

Watch all videos »

Case of the month

$7,750,000 Recovery Due to Negligent Care in NYC Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

Our client, a 5 year-old patient receives almost $8 million in compensation from an NYC hospital in a medical malpractice claim won by Rosenberg, Minc,Falkoff & Wolf. Daniel Minc, representing the injured child with his team of legal and medical experts said "it was great day for the family".

The case involved negligent care on the part of the hospital pediatric intensive care unit for failing to observe bleeding from a simple biopsy wound which caused Neurological damage.

Medical Malpractice Blog

$25 million verdict against New York Methodist Hospital
When a child is born, parents expect the doctor, nurses and other staff to provide care that is up to the...
Read This Malpractice Post

Experienced & Trusted medical malpractice lawyers

  • Top Lawyers 2016
  • Litigator Awards
  • Verdicts and Settlement Hall of Fame
  • BBB Accredited Business | A+
  • Avvo Rating 10.0 Superb | Top Attorney Medical Malpractice
  • Rated By Super Lawyers | Daniel C. Minc | 5 years
Call 1-866-516-5887 or email us to set up your free, confidential consultation. Our experience can make a difference for you.

Office Locations - Call today to schedule a consultation 1-866-516-5887

16 Court Street
Brooklyn, NY 11241

Brooklyn Law Office

3101 Broadway
Astoria, NY 11106

Astoria Law Office

8900 Sutphin Blvd
Suite 501
Queens, NY 11435

Queens Law Office

9201 4th Ave
Brooklyn, NY 11209

Brooklyn Law Office

Firm News

Robert H. Wolff Named President
Firm Attorney, Robert H. Wolff is now the president of the New York City Bronx County Bar Association
About This Attorney

Back to Top