$I Billion for Injured New Yorkers
Our Results
  • $30.1 Million NYC - Medical Malpractice Case
  • $15 Million Manhattan - Medical Malpractice Case
  • $3 Million Queens - Wrongful Death Case
  • $5.5 Million Bronx - Birth Injury Accident
  • $30.1 Million NYC - Medical Malpractice Case
  • $15 Million Manhattan - Medical Malpractice Case
  • $3 Million Queens - Wrongful Death Case
  • $5.5 Million Bronx - Birth Injury Accident
  • $7.75 Million NYC - Medical Malpractice Case
Rosenberg, Minc, Falkoff & Wolff, LLP
Experienced & Trusted Medical Malpractice Lawyers
Call today for a Free Consultation
Serving the greater NYC Area: Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, Bronx & Staten Island

Bench Trial or Jury Trial for a Medical Malpractice Case

Did you know that when you bring a medical malpractice lawsuit, you have the right to have your case heard by the judge, and render a decision by the judge, as opposed to having a jury rendered decision? Even when this is allowed, most injured victims in New York prefer to have their case heard by a jury.

When you ask a judge to hear your case, it is known as a bench trial, and you are presenting the same type of evidence and information to one person. The judge will make rulings of law, and will be responsible for rendering a decision about whether or not your case has merit, and if so how much compensation should be awarded to you.

Why Victims and Lawyers Usually Prefer Jury Trial

Why then many cases of accidents, medical malpractice, or wrongful death are not tried in front of the judge alone. There is a consensus throughout the legal community that people who are injured victims will probably get a better shot at justice by having a six-member jury, who will listen to their case and ultimately make a decision about whether or not the victim is entitled to compensation. However, it cannot be said for certain that better justice is always availed through a jury trial.

Nevertheless, many people and attorneys believe that since judges hear these cases all the time, and if you were to rely solely on a judge who has heard so many of these cases, he might be jaded. Therefore, you would not want such a person make that ultimate decision about how much compensation you should be awarded.

Weighing the Pros and Cons

Therefore, majority of the injured victims who bring lawsuits in the state of New York, usually request their case be heard before a jury. The jury consists of six people of the community, who will listen to the evidence, and ultimately make a decision whether the plaintiff has proven the case, and if so how much compensation should be awarded to them. The jurors are not likely to be jaded or cynical about the system, since they do not listen to cases all the time. They will have a fresh perspective, and they are more likely to relate to what the victim is suffering.

The judge on the other hand would be handling many such cases every day, and his perspective could be dulled by the sheer repetition of victims and similarities between the cases. In such a condition, the judge will not be able to connect with suffering of the victim in the required manner, and therefore may not be able arrive at a reasonable compensation.

Hard to Please

However, juries could also be unpredictable, and it needs only one biased juror to ruin the case. Sometimes, juries are known to render decisions, which are not only unpredictable, but also unsupported by evidence presented at the trial. However, these are rare occurrences, whereas a judge is usually jaded, turned off, or unimpressed due to this workload. Therefore, when we consider the pros and cons of jury trial and bench trial, jury trial seems to be much more advantageous for obtaining justice and fair compensation.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Learn About Medical Malpractice Cases in NYC

Watch all videos »

Listen to our clients

Watch all videos »

Case of the month

$7,750,000 Recovery Due to Negligent Care in NYC Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

Our client, a 5-year-old patient, receives almost $8 million in compensation from an NYC hospital in a medical malpractice claim won by Rosenberg, Minc, Falkoff & Wolf. Representing the injured child with his team of legal and medical experts, Daniel Minc said, "It was great day for the family."

The case involved negligent care on the part of the hospital pediatric intensive care unit for failing to observe bleeding from a simple biopsy wound which caused neurological damage.

Medical Malpractice Blog

$25 million verdict against New York Methodist Hospital
When a child is born, parents expect the doctor, nurses and other staff to provide care that is up to the...
Read This Malpractice Post

Experienced & Trusted medical malpractice lawyers

  • Top Lawyers 2016
  • Litigator Awards
  • Verdicts and Settlement Hall of Fame
  • BBB Accredited Business | A+
  • Avvo Rating 10.0 Superb | Top Attorney Medical Malpractice
  • Rated By Super Lawyers | Daniel C. Minc | 5 years
Call 1-866-516-5887 or email us to set up your free, confidential consultation. Our experience can make a difference for you.

Office Locations - Call today to schedule a consultation 1-866-516-5887

16 Court Street
Brooklyn, NY 11241

Brooklyn Law Office

3101 Broadway
Astoria, NY 11106

Astoria Law Office

8900 Sutphin Blvd
Suite 501
Queens, NY 11435

Queens Law Office

9201 4th Ave
Brooklyn, NY 11209

Brooklyn Law Office

Firm News

Robert H. Wolff Named President
Firm Attorney, Robert H. Wolff is now the president of the New York City Bronx County Bar Association
About This Attorney

Back to Top