$I Billion for Injured New Yorkers
Our Results
  • $30.1 Million NYC - Medical Malpractice Case
  • $15 Million Manhattan - Medical Malpractice Case
  • $3 Million Queens - Wrongful Death Case
  • $5.5 Million Bronx - Birth Injury Accident
  • $30.1 Million NYC - Medical Malpractice Case
  • $15 Million Manhattan - Medical Malpractice Case
  • $3 Million Queens - Wrongful Death Case
  • $5.5 Million Bronx - Birth Injury Accident
  • $7.75 Million NYC - Medical Malpractice Case
Rosenberg, Minc, Falkoff & Wolff, LLP
Experienced & Trusted Medical Malpractice Lawyers
Call today for a Free Consultation
Serving the greater NYC Area: Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, Bronx & Staten Island

Can a Doctor be Prosecuted for Providing Treatment that has not been Proven

Can a doctor choose to treat a patient with a treatment that has not been proved to work or a treatment that does not conform to the accepted standards of medical care?

Doctor must Conform to the Accepted Standards of Medical Care

The answer is no. A doctor cannot simply choose a treatment because somebody else has tried it in the past. A treatment should conform to the accepted standards of medical care, or should have some scientific basis, which shows that such a treatment could work. A doctor is supposed to conform to accepted practices for treating a particular disease or ailment, and is not supposed to perform any procedure or give any treatment that has not been scientifically tested before.

This is a human being, not a guinea pig.

An Actual Example of a Doctor Providing an Unscientific Treatment

Here is a typical instance of a doctor violating the basis standards of care, in a failure to diagnose cancer. The patient had gone to this board certified urologist with certain complaints, and the doctor started to treat these complaints by giving the patient coffee enemas. Needless to say, this treatment did not work. The patient developed cancer and continued to have the cancer grow throughout his body, and was not recognized by the doctor until it had spread throughout his entire body.

At the deposition and trial, the doctor was asked a key question. The plaintiff's lawyer asked, "Doctor, you claim that you can treat cancer with coffee enemas. Can you show me any scientific proof; any medical proof that confirms you can treat cancer with coffee enemas?" The doctor was obviously unable to come with any proof or medical studies that supported treating cancer with coffee enemas.

The lawyer then asked the doctor, why he treated this patient with coffee enemas, for which the doctor replied that he had heard anecdotally that such treatment would work. The lawyer then asked if that was the accepted and basic standard of care that should be provided to a patient with cancer. The doctor had no other choice but to say that he had violated the basic standards of medical care; probably hoping it would work making him famous.

Grounds for a Medical Malpractice Case

The job of a doctor or urologist, as in this case, is to diagnose and treat the patient. Furthermore, the treatment provided should conform to good and accepted standards of medical practice. A doctor cannot provide medical care and treatment that departs, deviates, or violates the basic standards of medical care. Especially, when there is no confirmation or scientific evidence, which confirms that this type of treatment actually works, or does anything beneficial for a patient with cancer or any other type of disease.

Hence, this would be a clear example, where the doctor has violated the basic standards of care, and has used a treatment approach that is not only untested but also has no scientific basis. This would clearly prove liability for the doctor, which means the doctor can be held liable for what he has done.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Learn About Medical Malpractice Cases in NYC

Watch all videos »

Listen to our clients

Watch all videos »

Case of the month

$7,750,000 Recovery Due to Negligent Care in NYC Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

Our client, a 5-year-old patient, receives almost $8 million in compensation from an NYC hospital in a medical malpractice claim won by Rosenberg, Minc, Falkoff & Wolf. Representing the injured child with his team of legal and medical experts, Daniel Minc said, "It was great day for the family."

The case involved negligent care on the part of the hospital pediatric intensive care unit for failing to observe bleeding from a simple biopsy wound which caused neurological damage.

Medical Malpractice Blog

$25 million verdict against New York Methodist Hospital
When a child is born, parents expect the doctor, nurses and other staff to provide care that is up to the...
Read This Malpractice Post

Experienced & Trusted medical malpractice lawyers

  • Top Lawyers 2016
  • Litigator Awards
  • Verdicts and Settlement Hall of Fame
  • BBB Accredited Business | A+
  • Avvo Rating 10.0 Superb | Top Attorney Medical Malpractice
  • Rated By Super Lawyers | Daniel C. Minc | 5 years
Call 1-866-516-5887 or email us to set up your free, confidential consultation. Our experience can make a difference for you.

Office Locations - Call today to schedule a consultation 1-866-516-5887

16 Court Street
Brooklyn, NY 11241

Brooklyn Law Office

3101 Broadway
Astoria, NY 11106

Astoria Law Office

8900 Sutphin Blvd
Suite 501
Queens, NY 11435

Queens Law Office

9201 4th Ave
Brooklyn, NY 11209

Brooklyn Law Office

Firm News

Robert H. Wolff Named President
Firm Attorney, Robert H. Wolff is now the president of the New York City Bronx County Bar Association
About This Attorney

Back to Top