$I Billion for Injured New Yorkers
Our Results
  • $30.1 Million NYC - Medical Malpractice Case
  • $15 Million Manhattan - Medical Malpractice Case
  • $3 Million Queens - Wrongful Death Case
  • $5.5 Million Bronx - Birth Injury Accident
  • $30.1 Million NYC - Medical Malpractice Case
  • $15 Million Manhattan - Medical Malpractice Case
  • $3 Million Queens - Wrongful Death Case
  • $5.5 Million Bronx - Birth Injury Accident
  • $7.75 Million NYC - Medical Malpractice Case
Rosenberg, Minc, Falkoff & Wolff, LLP
Experienced & Trusted Medical Malpractice Lawyers
Call today for a Free Consultation
Serving the greater NYC Area: Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, Bronx & Staten Island

Failure to Diagnose Cancer at the Outset

Can a person file a medical malpractice case against his or her doctor, if the doctor was unable to diagnose the cancer earlier, and the patient had to undergo chemotherapy because of this delay in the diagnosis?

Failure to Diagnose Lung Cancer when it could have been Diagnosed

The scenario is a medical malpractice case where the victim has sued her doctor for failing to diagnose her lung cancer early. The plaintiff's lawyer has the opportunity to question this doctor during the pretrial question and answer session known as the deposition. The lawyer will want to focus on one of the key areas, which is how the treatment would have been different if his client's condition was diagnosed earlier.

How the Treatment and Prognosis would be Different

Typically, this would be the line of questioning by the plaintiff's lawyer:

· Is it true that at this stage the patient has been diagnosed with stage 4 metastatic lung cancer?

· Isn't this the most severe and advanced type of metastatic cancer?

· Does it mean that the cancer has now spread beyond the lungs and the patient's prognosis is dim?

· Does the patient now have very limited life expectancy?

· If the patient had been diagnosed earlier with cancer when it was still stage 1, would not the prognosis be significantly better than what it is now?

· Is it true that for stage 1 cancer there are different modalities of treatment that are effective in eliminating the cancer?

· At stage 1, is not the cancer localized and can it not be surgically removed?

· Is it true that a patient diagnosed with stage 1 lung cancer does not need chemo therapy for treating the condition and only the surgical removal of the affected part would suffice?

At this juncture the doctor might start to argue about the specific type of cancer, and whether chemo therapy or radiation therapy might be necessary. However, the bottom line is that the plaintiff's lawyer will ask the doctor a key question about how treatment would be different because these items are vital to show to the jury later on during the trial.

Using a Doctor's Testimony at the Trial

If the case goes to trial, the plaintiff's lawyer can use the doctor's deposition testimony to present to the jury two incredible points. One is that his client now had to undergo complex and harmful treatment procedures such as chemotherapy and radiation therapy because the doctor was unable to diagnose the lung cancer earlier. Secondly, and most importantly, the patient did not have a bright prognosis even with such treatments since the cancer had now spread beyond the lungs.

The jury will be made to understand that if the doctor had diagnosed lung cancer earlier, the patient would most probably have been cured by transitioning through a surgical procedure, and even after the surgery, the patient would not need chemotherapy.

Based on this viewpoint, a doctor can be sued for medical malpractice if he has failed to diagnose cancer earlier, when it was possible for him to do so. The damages will be based on the complexities of later treatment and the unenlightening prognosis.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Learn About Medical Malpractice Cases in NYC

Watch all videos »

Listen to our clients

Watch all videos »

Case of the month

$7,750,000 Recovery Due to Negligent Care in NYC Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

Our client, a 5-year-old patient, receives almost $8 million in compensation from an NYC hospital in a medical malpractice claim won by Rosenberg, Minc, Falkoff & Wolf. Representing the injured child with his team of legal and medical experts, Daniel Minc said, "It was great day for the family."

The case involved negligent care on the part of the hospital pediatric intensive care unit for failing to observe bleeding from a simple biopsy wound which caused neurological damage.

Medical Malpractice Blog

$25 million verdict against New York Methodist Hospital
When a child is born, parents expect the doctor, nurses and other staff to provide care that is up to the...
Read This Malpractice Post

Experienced & Trusted medical malpractice lawyers

  • Top Lawyers 2016
  • Litigator Awards
  • Verdicts and Settlement Hall of Fame
  • BBB Accredited Business | A+
  • Avvo Rating 10.0 Superb | Top Attorney Medical Malpractice
  • Rated By Super Lawyers | Daniel C. Minc | 5 years
Call 1-866-516-5887 or email us to set up your free, confidential consultation. Our experience can make a difference for you.

Office Locations - Call today to schedule a consultation 1-866-516-5887

16 Court Street
Brooklyn, NY 11241

Brooklyn Law Office

3101 Broadway
Astoria, NY 11106

Astoria Law Office

8900 Sutphin Blvd
Suite 501
Queens, NY 11435

Queens Law Office

9201 4th Ave
Brooklyn, NY 11209

Brooklyn Law Office

Firm News

Robert H. Wolff Named President
Firm Attorney, Robert H. Wolff is now the president of the New York City Bronx County Bar Association
About This Attorney

Back to Top