$I Billion for Injured New Yorkers
Our Results
  • $30.1 Million NYC - Medical Malpractice Case
  • $15 Million Manhattan - Medical Malpractice Case
  • $3 Million Queens - Wrongful Death Case
  • $5.5 Million Bronx - Birth Injury Accident
  • $30.1 Million NYC - Medical Malpractice Case
  • $15 Million Manhattan - Medical Malpractice Case
  • $3 Million Queens - Wrongful Death Case
  • $5.5 Million Bronx - Birth Injury Accident
  • $7.75 Million NYC - Medical Malpractice Case
Rosenberg, Minc, Falkoff & Wolff, LLP
Experienced & Trusted Medical Malpractice Lawyers
Call today for a Free Consultation
Serving the greater NYC Area: Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, Bronx & Staten Island

How does the Jury know which Side to Believe

Whom to Believe?

In a medical malpractice trial or for that matter any personal injury trial, the two sides will have opposing views. If the plaintiff's expert witness says something, it is at once contradicted by the defense's witness and so on. In such a situation, how does the jury know whom to believe?

In every case, whether it is a medical malpractice case, accident case, or even wrongful death case, there is a dispute between the two sides. One side will say one thing and the other side will stand in front of the angle taken and either avoid or deflect it. There is always a legal dispute, and each side will bring in their own witnesses to support their side of their story or their claim.

Now, the jury is faced with listening to two totally opposing versions of what happened and who is responsible. How does the jury actually decide whom to believe?

Past Experience is a Wonderful Guide

The answer is simpler than you think. Let us look at this by giving an example. Suppose you are meeting someone for the very first time at a party, and you begin talking to them. During the first few moments of this conversation, you form in your own mind an opinion whether this person is credible or believable. Whatever they are saying, does it make sense? You know from your past experiences, or own personal circumstances, whether you can immediately trust this person or whether you should be on guard in terms of what you say. You form an opinion whether the person is trustworthy or not.

It is the same thing at trial. In fact, the whole point of a trial is to establish credibility. It is to establish whether what you are saying is more likely true than not true. At the end of the trial, the judge will in fact tell the jury that they have to evaluate the credibility of both sides. On top of this, the judge will explain to the jury that if they feel that what you have claimed sounds more likely true than not true, then they should pass judgment in your favor.

How do you evaluate whether someone is telling the truth? You have to use your own acumen and logic. The jury does the same. They will see if the person is contradicting something that he has said during the pretrial testimony. Is there something that is just not believable about their story? Is there a testimony that an expert is giving that makes no sense whatsoever? Does the witness make sense? Is he believable? Is he credible?

Falsus in Uno

The judge will give an important instruction to the jury at the end of the case, before they go to deliberate. It is called Falsus in Uno, which is a Latin term. It says that if you find that a witness has testified falsely about one thing, you can disregard all of their testimony should you choose to do so. This can be devastating since the entire testimony can be disregarded by the jury even if only one point in it seems false or not credible. This makes either side focus on being consistent.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Learn About Medical Malpractice Cases in NYC

Watch all videos »

Listen to our clients

Watch all videos »

Case of the month

$7,750,000 Recovery Due to Negligent Care in NYC Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

Our client, a 5 year-old patient receives almost $8 million in compensation from an NYC hospital in a medical malpractice claim won by Rosenberg, Minc,Falkoff & Wolf. Daniel Minc, representing the injured child with his team of legal and medical experts said "it was great day for the family".

The case involved negligent care on the part of the hospital pediatric intensive care unit for failing to observe bleeding from a simple biopsy wound which caused Neurological damage.

Medical Malpractice Blog

$25 million verdict against New York Methodist Hospital
When a child is born, parents expect the doctor, nurses and other staff to provide care that is up to the...
Read This Malpractice Post

Experienced & Trusted medical malpractice lawyers

  • Top Lawyers 2016
  • Litigator Awards
  • Verdicts and Settlement Hall of Fame
  • BBB Accredited Business | A+
  • Avvo Rating 10.0 Superb | Top Attorney Medical Malpractice
  • Rated By Super Lawyers | Daniel C. Minc | 5 years
Call 1-866-516-5887 or email us to set up your free, confidential consultation. Our experience can make a difference for you.

Office Locations - Call today to schedule a consultation 1-866-516-5887

16 Court Street
Brooklyn, NY 11241

Brooklyn Law Office

3101 Broadway
Astoria, NY 11106

Astoria Law Office

8900 Sutphin Blvd
Suite 501
Queens, NY 11435

Queens Law Office

9201 4th Ave
Brooklyn, NY 11209

Brooklyn Law Office

Firm News

Robert H. Wolff Named President
Firm Attorney, Robert H. Wolff is now the president of the New York City Bronx County Bar Association
About This Attorney

Back to Top