In a medical malpractice trial, the plaintiff’s attorney has the opportunity of questioning and cross-examining the defense’s medical expert. However, he makes the critical mistake of asking, “Doctor tell us why?” This gives the doctor opportunity to provide an elaborate explanation.
The deposition is a question and answer session under oath that takes place before the trial. When you have filed a medical malpractice lawsuit, you lawyer will have the opportunity at this session to ask a number of questions to the doctor, to find out more details about the case. The main information the lawyer will try to find out is:
You must have watched cross-examination of witnesses in a trial, in many popular TV series. However, there are specific strategies in cross-examining a witness in medical malpractice cases. Two key elements of a successful cross-examination are preparation, and keeping the witness on a very short leash.
Once you have settled your accident or medical malpractice case, you will want to know when you will be getting your settlement check. All victims will have this question in mind when they settle their case. They would want to receive the check as quickly as possible.
Many attorneys put commercials on TV to market their services and their firm’s capabilities. However, can you depend on the content of these ads to make a decision about which lawyer to choose? The answer is definitely not, because these commercials do not give any useful information. All these TV commercials about attorneys advertising say the same thing. They all say that if you have been injured, you should call me, as we have been in this business for a long time. However, these ads fail to tell you why you should choose them, or why they are different from any other lawyers.
Did you know that before a medical malpractice trial can actually start the judge would want the two lawyers to stipulate to a set of facts that are already agreed to? In every single case, a certain set of facts are clearly agreed to. For instance, in a medical malpractice case, the two sides will agree when the incident in question took place, where it took place, and so on. Hence, there are certain facts that are clearly agreed to and stipulated.
Everyone knows that surgical procedures have inherent risks, but many patients don’t realize that one of the major risks they face during surgery is medical negligence. Each year, 98,000 patients die as a direct result of some form of medical malpractice, according to an Institute of Medicine study.
Is it possible to unring the bell at the time of a medical malpractice trial? Do you think that if you have said something that should not be said, the jury is likely to forget what you said? During the course of the trial, it is possible for either of the sides to say something that they should not have said. The judge might have decided that a particular topic is completely off limits, and one of the parties addresses something that the judge had ordered not to discuss.
A transcript is nothing more than a booklet containing questions and answers given under oath. Typically, this information is gathered in pretrial testimony, which is a question and answer session called a deposition. This transcript can be quite powerful weapon during the trial.
If a doctor intentionally causes you harm in New York, then his insurance company will most likely not provide him with the coverage. Every doctor in New York is required to carry medical malpractice insurance. They do that for the key reason that if the patient suffers harm because of the doctor’s carelessness, the patient has the ability to be compensated by the doctor’s insurance company.
